UK Payday Loan Service
This article looks at the way banks exploit customers with NSF and overdraft fees. It contrasts this with the alternative of using instant cash loans and proposes that these are in fact cheaper than bank fees. It goes on to show how banks lobby aggressively against the payday industry fearing cuts in there fees. The findings are based on a US study by the federal government and is freely down loadable.
An independent agency of the federal government, the FDIC was created in 1933 in response to the thousands of bank failures that occurred in the 1920s and early 1930s. The commission is managed by 5 people who constitute a board of directors. They are all appointed by the President and confirmed in the Senate. No more than three can be from he same political party.
The FDIC Study of Bank Overdraft Programs was initiated in 2006 in response to the rapid growth of automated overdraft programs, defined as programs in which the bank honors a customer's overdraft obligations using standardized procedures to determine whether the non-sufficient fund (NSF) transaction qualifies for overdraft coverage. Data and information were gathered through a survey of a sample of institutions representing 1,171 FDIC-supervised banks, and a separate data request of customer account and transaction-level data from a smaller set of 39 institutions.
FDIC publishes the results of a 2 year study on the banking systems use of overdraft programs. The study found that a typical NSF check can result in overdraft fees and interest in excess of 3,500 percent APR. In addition, the study found that customers in low-income areas (median annual income of less than $30,000) were nearly twice as likely to incur these charges.
The FDIC study reinforces the payday loan industry's position that short-term cash advance loans are significantly less expensive than traditional bank overdraft fees. The study also found that, unlike payday loan companies that offer on-demand products, most banks (75.1 percent) automatically enrolled customers in overdraft programs that carry APRs and other fees far more expensive than the typical cash advance loan.
The study concluded that a typical customer would incur fees of $27- for each $20 overdraft over a 2 week period. A $60- ATM overdraft in 2 weeks would incur an APR of 1,067 percent. A customer repaying a $60 ATM overdraft in two weeks would incur an APR of 1,173 percent and a customer repaying a $66 check overdraft in two weeks would incur an APR of 1,067 percent. Oddly enough the faster one pays down the overdraft the higher the APR turned out to be.
Some consumer advocacy groups like the CRL are lobbying to ban payday loans. This leaves customers with no option than to pay overdraft fees to the banks. CRL have led a charge to pass a law banning payday lending in Ohio. In 2006, Ken Compton, CEO of Advance America, said, "Contrary to the CRL's spin, responsible uses of the payday product provides consumers firm footing to overcome unexpected financial circumstances,".
Some key findings;
Over 90% of banks completed overdraft fees without informing the customer.Less than 8 percent of banks inform consumers that funds are insufficient before transactions are completed, offering the customers an opportunity to cancel the NSF transaction and avoid a fee.
Bank customers complaints about overdraft fees were received by twelve percent of banks.
About nine percent of bank customers have 10 or more NSF transactions per year. 4.9 percent had 20 or more NSF transactions. Customer accounts with 20 or more NSF transactions were charged $1,610 per year in NSF fees on average.
An independent agency of the federal government, the FDIC was created in 1933 in response to the thousands of bank failures that occurred in the 1920s and early 1930s. The commission is managed by 5 people who constitute a board of directors. They are all appointed by the President and confirmed in the Senate. No more than three can be from he same political party.
The FDIC Study of Bank Overdraft Programs was initiated in 2006 in response to the rapid growth of automated overdraft programs, defined as programs in which the bank honors a customer's overdraft obligations using standardized procedures to determine whether the non-sufficient fund (NSF) transaction qualifies for overdraft coverage. Data and information were gathered through a survey of a sample of institutions representing 1,171 FDIC-supervised banks, and a separate data request of customer account and transaction-level data from a smaller set of 39 institutions.
FDIC publishes the results of a 2 year study on the banking systems use of overdraft programs. The study found that a typical NSF check can result in overdraft fees and interest in excess of 3,500 percent APR. In addition, the study found that customers in low-income areas (median annual income of less than $30,000) were nearly twice as likely to incur these charges.
The FDIC study reinforces the payday loan industry's position that short-term cash advance loans are significantly less expensive than traditional bank overdraft fees. The study also found that, unlike payday loan companies that offer on-demand products, most banks (75.1 percent) automatically enrolled customers in overdraft programs that carry APRs and other fees far more expensive than the typical cash advance loan.
The study concluded that a typical customer would incur fees of $27- for each $20 overdraft over a 2 week period. A $60- ATM overdraft in 2 weeks would incur an APR of 1,067 percent. A customer repaying a $60 ATM overdraft in two weeks would incur an APR of 1,173 percent and a customer repaying a $66 check overdraft in two weeks would incur an APR of 1,067 percent. Oddly enough the faster one pays down the overdraft the higher the APR turned out to be.
Some consumer advocacy groups like the CRL are lobbying to ban payday loans. This leaves customers with no option than to pay overdraft fees to the banks. CRL have led a charge to pass a law banning payday lending in Ohio. In 2006, Ken Compton, CEO of Advance America, said, "Contrary to the CRL's spin, responsible uses of the payday product provides consumers firm footing to overcome unexpected financial circumstances,".
Some key findings;
Over 90% of banks completed overdraft fees without informing the customer.Less than 8 percent of banks inform consumers that funds are insufficient before transactions are completed, offering the customers an opportunity to cancel the NSF transaction and avoid a fee.
Bank customers complaints about overdraft fees were received by twelve percent of banks.
About nine percent of bank customers have 10 or more NSF transactions per year. 4.9 percent had 20 or more NSF transactions. Customer accounts with 20 or more NSF transactions were charged $1,610 per year in NSF fees on average.
About the Author:
Marsha Smythe is fascinated by the concept of APR and how banks can get away with charging such high amounts. He makes available on his blog downloads from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). These are a must read for anyone contemplating overdraft versus payday loans. Although US bank orientated the same rules apply to both UK Instant Payday Loan Online and Canada payday cash.
posted by Debt Consolidation Loan at
7:24 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home